n-force

Members - Veterans
  • Content count

    1,147
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by n-force

  1. There are a lot of people using it. If it's not allowed enforce it. If it's allowed let us know.
  2. An apc should not take 4-5 anti tank rockets to destroy. Fix it, it's ridiculous.
  3. n-force

    Chat from players and some repeating info

    Instead of nerfing headshots maybe buff all shots.
  4. Please add this feature , i tried using middle mouse for it but it is really annoying . Had to make a macro but i dont only use h&g on pc when i forget it annoys me a lot . Also not all players have macros . While at it please also make debug controls toggle . Problem is i use my left little finger for debug controls then i have my thumb and right hand left for camera controls . I dont want to use thumb nor i want to keep pressing middle mouse , it s like the button i hate most . Atm i use mouse 5 with toggle macro and i became a noob so hurry up please !
  5. Can you give me the link to this page?
  6. Thank you for your extremely valuable input. That's what I'm talking about. There is no punishment for macros. It's all in the grey.
  7. n-force

    Chat from players and some repeating info

    This solution is extremely lazy and funny. There are many other ways of solving that problem. Less rof for starters..
  8. n-force

    Chat from players and some repeating info

    Surviving a headshot is not unrealistic, it is outright laughable.
  9. I need to clear up something. I'm not accusing anybody of using macros. Especially not clans. I have no idea about that, my point was not the recoil control, as that is sophisticated it's not easy to come by, however full auto SA rifles, I believe I came by a lot of people using that. Autofire macro comes as a default macro entry for most gaming mice, even if it doesn't it's super easy to create one. I can't help but feel these people who have these mice in some unfavorable conditions would feel the itch to go for that autofire button. I mean why not? We don't even know if it's allowed or not. Nobody managed to give me an explicit statement that forbids macro usage. I made this post about random individuals whom I highly suspect were using autofire macro with SA rifles. And another huge reason for posting is that I'm honestly not sure if macros are allowed or not. If I'm not mistaken this is not the first time I'm trying to get something from devs regarding macro usage, I think I posted some stuff years ago, not completely sure I'll look for my old posts for that. I believe they never said explicitly that it's not allowed, at least not to the best of my recollection. My opinion is that there are a lot of people who use auto fire macros and since it's on youtube there must be at least one guy that uses recoil control macro. A lot does not mean there is one in every match. If I see one every day it's a lot and it's an issue that needs to be addressed. Anybody who thinks otherwise can just create an alt account and spam macro for days, see if anything happens to the account. Let us know too. Imo I think nothing will happen. Back in the day, I was using a macro to spam keyboard buttons for ribbon XP farming, never had any issues with that. I would go afk after I triggered it so it was working a full match, you know stuff like crouch movement, etc. I hope I don't get banned for stating this, it was like 5 years ago, and also at that time, I didn't know if macros are allowed or not. Hell, I still have no clue. Ofc with thousands of hours of grinding I would not risk my account and I would not expect any veteran to be so stupid. So the people who try to turn this into a flame war between clans I have put on ignore and will keep doing so. Edit: Found a topic where I was talking about macros It seems I wasn't so innocent lol. Edit2: Also I just realised I didn't read Baskerville's reply properly and agreed with him causing a dilemma. The macro involved keeping a button pressed, back then there was plane debug controls thing and I just didn't like pressing it up all the time so I made a macro for it.
  10. n-force

    Rock's

    Idk what kind of a map designing interface they coded but they seem to have a hard time changing even small details. Must be some potato.
  11. Please give us more numbers regarding what happened during the war. I want to see how many of battles won are actually assault because that's what really matters. The report we get atm is completely useless. If there is a way to check that I'm sorry please tell me how.
  12. Another one with reading deficiency goes to ignore list. Thanks, keep them coming. @viktor.oven that's quite interesting any idea why it is like that?
  13. n-force

    Get rid of the underdog bonus

    Why do soviets win the war? Because German Army is crippled by queue. How do you solve queue? Underdog bonus. The underdog bonus should never be removed. There is absolutely no logical reason to remove it.
  14. The reason I posted this was because I saw a random guy playing full auto with SVT, it was a random match with random people. Some people with 5 year old mentality try to bring up clan stuff and get good out of this. It's pathetic, they think the world revolves around them. Please don't feed them.
  15. I've read all 8 q&a in marv's post and i couldn't find one question regarding queue. I find this absurd. The most unbearable part in the game for me is the queue. In my opinion it should be solved urgently. Looking back to my old post on topic (in 2015), it's so sad this problem still exists in game. Even if my suggested solution was not very applicable/sustainable, it could still be implemented on a smaller scale and would actually relieve the queue to some degree. If not, all this time Reto could've brought up countless ideas to solve this annoying problem. Still it should be noted that adjusting AT size has always been the easiest option. However Reto decided to take another turn and added War Victory Ribbon. Now we all know there are more players on GE and as a direct result more generals. All generals on GE side immediately received more CP by this update, yes other factions did too but less generals meant less CP for them hence a direct enhancement of the issue. I was devastated by that update because i felt as if Reto wasn't acknowledging the queue as an actual problem. Unfortunately looking back, i see i was right to think that way. What is it that i'm annoyed so much about queue? 1- I believe a comparison of AT movement rates by factions would show how GE army is immobilized awfully. And another comparison about troops sleeping around Capitals would give us same result. The reason why is that people do not have all day to wait for deployment and cannot watch over their ATs and move them as much. Because of this immobilization GE is fighting outnumbered and being overrun easily. 2- I believe GE army is winning more battles only because most battles for GE are defensive and it's much easier to win defence battles. I believe this is also an outcome of immobilization of GE. 3- Queue makes it almost impossible to level up and is a direct frustration for players. I'm failing to see one logical reason why Reto would like queue to be in game. Because it's fun? Well sorry waiting isn't fun. I didn't sign up for a travian rip off. I do agree that it sounds like it adds some strategical value to RTS part but that's only in theory. Right now RTS is a cycle of repetitive events. I think at this point you should understand that you can't add everything you dream into the game. For the sake of strategy don't abandon FPS part and don't abandon RTS for GE players like that. I'm sure there are smarter ways of supplying the RTS with various strategical perspectives. You should limit amount of resources not by queue but by implementing a proper warfund economy. I don't know how new RTS system will be but listening only to your statements about a system that rewards the winning side with resources (which implies queue is there to stay), i can tell, you are not going on the right track. So please make proper/better planning about RTS part and please rethink about issue of queue. And yes it is an issue. Also please don't forget that RTS part is what attracts players in the first place. So just don't bore us to death with queue Reto, please. Let us play RTS, at present state it's very frustrating and very time consuming. I'm not trying to say get rid of queue completely, we've already watched that movie and it wasn't good but i'm pointing out to the fact that the shorter the queue the more fun it is for players and you should be working on ways to give us shorter queue. Anyways it's your game and your choice, good luck to you on your future journey. I hope you do what's best for your players, to wit: what's best for you.
  16. Explicitly means explicitly. That's is not explicit as you already had to explain further. They may not be using macros ofc I never scored that possibility over but still, I want them to be checked. That's what I'm planning to do, report everyone that fires too fast with SA rifles, it's not my job to determine if they are cheaters after all. If I get 1 cheater out of 10 it's a step towards a better game. But there is no explicit statement and I don't remember RETO staff posting about it on forums, I hadn't been around for a couple of years, maybe there is something in that timeline? From the time I was active I don't remember any official statements, so I've been wondering for years lol. All in all, I have high regard for SA rifle users, I myself love SA rifles and if I was more skilled and if I wasn't playing the faction with the worst SA rifle definitely I would play more. I don't want to boost their ego by naming but I know some old timers from US clans that were pretty overkill with a garand even back when SA rifles were absolute baseball.
  17. There are some people in this topic that just isn't worth the time to reply nor they actually deserve a reply, I have no problem feeding trolls but fools I do. Where is the ignore/block button on the forums? I cannot find it. Edit: found it and put the fool on complete ignore. On topic, macro SA rifles are a bit worrisome. When the macro is involved some of them have a good enough rate of fire to actually behave like a full auto weapon. The crazy part is the hipfire accuracy, it's almost like playing counter strike you don't actually have to aim much. There are also stuff online how they remove recoil from weapons, if autofire macro is cheating 1 level removing recoil is like level 10 cheating. But if it's allowed even still at least let us know because I was thinking of reporting some people, I don't want to waste my and devs time with tickets. Is it explicitly stated anywhere that using macros is not allowed?
  18. Well a software macro is basically a hack, because it's messing with stuff you can't know how far it goes about messing, it's risky to use because anti cheat may just ban you automatically. Hardware macro is generally allowed on other games.. But macros got so sophisticated nowadays, it's gonna kill fair gaming in the end.
  19. It sucks big time when random people spawn inferior tanks so for this reason i think it would be better to have different ATs for different tanks. It can be a progression system. And it also adds the strategy part of the game. When it's against pure infantry one can consider sending pz3 for example.
  20. n-force

    AR to Moral Death

    And who said a war should take no more than a couple days ? There is no noticeable gain from war hence there is actually no need to win wars. Which is fine by me, i'd feel like it's more of an achievement if i won a 5 months war. Longer wars have an effect of making queue little bit more tolerable as well. I find any system foolish that favors winning side. War Victory ribbon is no exception. Edit: Whoever you are take your upvote back !
  21. n-force

    hile yapmadığım halde ban yedim

    Mouse macro programlari filan gibi arka planda calisan bazi programlar guvenlik duvarina takiliyor. Daha once bunu yasayip bani kaldirilanlar oldu destege mesaj atin mumkunse ingilizce.