Members - Veterans
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

41 Neutral

1 Follower

About Chemie

  • Rank
    Sergeant Major

Faction & Soldier

  • Faction
  • Soldier
    All types
  1. Introducing a new anti-cheat system

    A good start but it will not be enough. You will still need some people to have 3rd person view on suspects to get the gate closed even more.
  2. Sadly, they made them in game like you said as they shouldn't be not. But.... even here... differeant armies, differeant doctrines
  3. tunnels for getting outside spawn as additional way out.
  4. Too be honest... I even would see they return to only 2 factions and not add more. Why? Because it already giving problems like playerbase etc and more factions will split players up even more. Second, there is no garantee that it will not turn into a 1 vs x factions. But... I would see 2 Factions and within those factions you can add nations, like UK CZ etc etc without having problems on playerbase much as all nations just belong to the 2 factions at the end. And the factions playing against each other.
  5. New blocking mechanic

    They also said it would be mid last year to have a massive RTS update.
  6. New blocking mechanic

    Just remove lines, get a hexa grid system instead and you have to fight for every tile on the map. A tile can give you skirmishes as the landscape would be. It would open so many doors to implentate so many new things like, maps, vegetation, camouflage, new (specilized) units etc etc. Get rid of the old line mechanism where you have this kind of problems. Many times already proposed but not heard by them or not wanted to be heard. You have to keep this kind of things simple, bugs will get in much easier by emplementing more ROE. Regards,
  7. The last one

    First of all recon class is misused in this game and demoted to snipers. Yes @cincirius, it is their choise to choose their tactic.... if you had an FPS game without RTS. Now they use somebody else his warfunds/gold for using their tactics. What not specified is in the same line. Beside war should be played for victoies or seach and destroy, not for leveling up a rookie character. Those 1 vs 1 on cqc with a BA was fun those days. Beside Treefairies we have now bushmen in it, even without Australia as faction. Time to step back more to what it was. A RTS game with FPS influencing the RTS. Make staged more accetable for leveling up charachters in war. As in war they use other playes recources and some of them played hard for them. btw, nice constructive feedback @zaerius. I can find myself in it as well.
  8. they hadn't allow multi accounts in the first place. It was already said in the pre 100 wars, seemed nobody to interesting. Still there should be no "making harder" but just not allow. Yeah, yeah the brother sister etc with same IP. many other games give you the option to make a request to have a second account on the same IP. Agree it is hard to get them out 100% but they can, and they should it much harder and making more trouble to get a second account on the same IP. It's a way of disencourage people to do. Simple example of my "almost daily" RL: As trainer in youth and mans team of my club, my players have to inform me. There are many ways to do and I know if they not want to come they just will stay away. But to inform me they have several options in these days. The hardest one for all to use is just to call me and tell what is the problem. I know that one is harder as you can her mostly in voices if they lie or not. On some messanger apps you can't. same as with some other team apps that are available. To call me is just an extra way of disencourage them for not canceling for no real reason. Who want still can do as you can't avoid it.
  9. A solution to AA vs Aircraft

    Impossible is it not to destroy the heavies with current AA. even if you know how to aim it isn't that hard eaither. But.... the chance you will survive as well is very small and if you not have set the firt projectiles on the right spot you will die and he will only be damaged hard. It is too eay to get the current AA be disabled/destroyed. Add to it non woul make AA positions like that due the limited line of firte to the horizon. In the time we used the M109 one of the first things we had to do is make an elevation table for the sector we shoul be able to fire on. The positions are crap.
  10. No. Simply you join a FPS game that others have set up for a reason. Units can retreat, soldiers are deserting
  11. Fair buff to STG/AVS

    I use only Jägerpatrone Kurz and the sights. Makes first 4 bullets almost all hitting the target. You can even forget the Jägerpatrone and use the stock ammo. It will be a bit more accurate but will drop damage fast. On automatic weapons stability is more usefull for me as RoF. A high rate of Fire will bring me nothing if they spread out too much. Only a way to increase costs. Btw, not using badges for my primary weapon on this char.
  12. I don't think limits will be the solution on forhand. We had a nice assault teams a way back. Anti Tank infantry. It could be thought over to make some badges and weapons only available for more specialist units. In those days the anti tank inf had only some worth in the autoresolves those days. But for example get some engineers to lay mine fiels (engineer units) Anti tank inf with panzerschreck/bazooka or PTRD (anti tank inf unit) etc etc. MG on bipods yes, but including recoil. High recoil when you fire while standing, medium when you are on your knees and low when you lay down (MG's). PTRD only can be fired from bipod and laying (including all other anti tank guns, if they would be coming). Make this for all weapons and you one step closer how it works in real life as well. Recoil can be bit lowered with the MG when they use bipods. A change that will require more adjustments as well. The total pat of balancing of weapons can be dropped if they make the weapons inline of what they really were. Just make it so it fits in game. Long long time ago I created a table of the weapons that were available at that time.
  13. RTS - Real Time shirt

    Maybe they had to get the system they had a bit more tuned. In the earlier days AR was fought by AI. Well not foght minut by minut but AT's came out damaged if the AR was "large". AT level was included the resolving so a level 3 inf counted more as a level 1 inf. For now the battle should be fought after x time players not join and fought til x% of troops so they will retreat or even get lost. But.. .atm there is just a huge danger as too many whales would be able to do alot of damage. Warfunds should be rewarded even by AI fights. The AI fight can be stopped at any time when players join the battle to take over control. However the damage that was made by AI should be the starting conditions for the time players joining. In general Assault teams (specialist ones) should be more expensive. Expensive in a way you would need for example 3 guards to maintain a mech inf. Just an example to get the picture. Now tanks, paratroopers fighters etc will hurt you more as they do now when you loose them. RTS need to be fun but also a bit of more risky so a player have to think about it a bit longer if he/she want to take the risk. Add to that a frenchaise mechanisme so FPS players are paying a part of what they use to avoid massive losses to generals without taking FPS player to the responcibilitie of (mis)using. Ofcourse Underdog bonus should be removed, not even been implemented, from the beginning. It supported only the waste mentality of many.
  14. Biased Devs

    To the M24 chaffee example.... German ystopped with the production of light tanks around 1942. The Luchs is the last one and was assigned to recon forces, not to the tank units. The doctrine of Germany turned into the production of medium tanks. Sadly the game not have the characteristic doctrines of all armies that are in this game included. A chaffee woeld have face mostly medium class German tanks. That the chaffee is classed as light is still oke, as it was that way. And this showed already in the pass (not only due devs but hardly supported by some players who are gave some advice (don't forget those)), the doctrines of armies not counting and they just look to what could fit to eachother. Simply look at the MG42 how it is nerved to get in balance with other MG's. As man ystill believe it wasn't that accurate and not had that high RoF. It had. Later models and modifications the weapon was turned down the RoF, but still accurate. For those who still think it isn't, try it yourself, same as I did with our "patenschaftbattalion" during my active time of service. Yeah we had the possibility to shoot with some older weapons and not only with the G36. You blame Reto, but blame also some of the players who adviced them in this way. @Galius You trolling again as usual. This has nothing to do with so called Asymmetric balancing. Otherwise the luchs was assigned to the recons and the M24 had faced a medium tank on the techtree.
  15. A not-new Idea for the RTS! :-)

    Funny that you start over autoresolves. The SU are doing mostly the same including you, and others. Just a shame RETO went into to make AT's cheaper a long time ago, otherwise you would have lost alot only because tha Parablocks you set. Don't get me wrong as it is a legimit way to play. Just funny about those autoresolve part.