• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

188 Good


About ValorousTF

  • Rank
    Technical Sergeant

Faction & Soldier

  • Faction
  • Soldier

Recent Profile Visitors

562 profile views
  1. War hardcore mode

    What's the point of turning H&G into an RO2 clone? If you want to play H&G like it is RO2... then go play RO2 maybe.
  2. New winning town mechanic

    Are you CRAZY??? Why would anyone want such an awful feature in their game... right guys?
  3. We are not most hated faction any longer

    If I thought ORCAM was full of trolls and idiots then I would have said so, to be honest I had never even heard of ORCAM until now. Maybe don't jump to conclusions and think about the people on this forum who go around talking about trolling and salt all the time and don't assume i'm talking about you. I don't really care what you think about "the clans at the top" either, since we know that we are the ones getting work done in the war and maybe that's why we're at the top?
  4. We are not most hated faction any longer

    I didn't mention ORCAM specifically did I? Anyway, if you want to consider yourself the best NA clan in GE then go ahead, because you're probably the only NA clan in GE in the first place
  5. We are not most hated faction any longer

    TX playerbase is pretty small and since pretty much all of us playing with Jagers anyway both clans decided to merge.
  6. Best of MCbl4

    I have been waiting for this for such a long time.. This has brought a tear to my eye. :')
  7. We are not most hated faction any longer

    Just because the numbers are lower than they were in 2015 it doesn't mean that the TS is dead.. 1st Jagers and TX have seen an overwhelming wave of recruits lately, and with the new merge there will probably be a lot more recruiting being done, hopefully not by all of the "HAHA TROLLE LE XDDD" clans at the bottom of the ts...
  8. We are not most hated faction any longer

    The GE ts is perfectly fine.. I contemplated switching to US a long time ago but there are simply no popular/active US clans other than PIB and BAD.
  9. Scheisse :D

  10. Decreasing headshot multiplier ?

    There's nothing wrong with the headshot multiplier enabling every weapon to kill in one shot upon headshot, but there is something wrong with conefire giving headshots when they aren't deserved. It's about time someone makes a poll or something so RETO might revert conefire back to how it used to be.
  11. Weapon and ammunition configuration values

    Anywhere that I can find the damage modifiers for other attachments such as springs and barrels?
  12. ETA of RTS Changes?

    I'm seeing some crazily stupid shirt in this thread so i'm just going to paste what I said in another thread because doramass probably didn't see it. @doramass @LuisCyphre @Sqeek @Domobranc @fatal-is Doramass thinks that he's the smartest general in H&G but he couldn't pour water out of a shoe even if the instructions were written on the heel... There is no theory behind RTS in H&G other than meta gaming and a few unwritten rules for the action game, and as an experienced GE clanny I can assure you that we are very capable of handling our AT's and using them properly and we don't need common sense advice from anybody, especially doramass. All doramass did in that screenshot was state the obvious and use terms which he has no clue as to what they mean in the first place and it's frankly quite funny to see him try and impress people even though he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. If you want RTS advice, get it from someone smart and not someone who makes stupid ego-craving threads on the forums.
  13. Don't sweat it man, everything's been edited now so we're chill. I'm glad to see that something has come from this thread. The problem is that the data isn't really all that accurate unless you are able to attribute the total time that the MG42 is used universally in staged compared to every other weapon in the game, which is pretty much impossible without developer assistance. It's not really a thing where I don't trust you or disagree with you, it's just that fundamentally it isn't all that reliable to reinforce an argument. I had actually never seen this before, thanks for showing me.
  14. This is just disregarding the point I already made, so i'll write it a bit more clearly this time: Using the MG42 specifically as an example is not the problem, using ANY weapon to provide an example for your point is the problem. This is because people on the forum are inevitably going to derail the thread and spark a balance argument just like almost every other thread involving specific weapons has done so. To put it into context, by using the MG42 as the example the general implication is that the MG42 is involved in the problem, which contradicts the rest of the post claiming that weapon tiers are the problem. Call it an error in phrasing or wording but this is the way I see it. It's kind of silly to undermine your argument and constructiveness of your post given that you more than likely know that this thread would be derailed as soon as you mentioned the MG42, next time you should probably just get straight to the point and avoid unnecessary waffle which will just provoke an argument.. I'm assuming that it's your intent because like I said earlier in this post, it's the general implication from the post that you are trying to do so by involving a specific gun in the thread even though it is unnecessary Admittedly, I probably should have phrased this much better and said that.. 'The argument for tiered matchmaking is not necessarily invalid, however the relevance of the MG42 to the argument is null and based entirely off of anecdotal evidence therefore there is no credible source to prove it.' Yes, this does still assume that the MG42 is the centre of the argument as the Title and post content would imply. Nope, just like you said yourself it is simply sardonic humour. Now that you've edited the original post I don't really have anything to argue against, but good on you for editing it. ^^ I understand the first part of this but what exactly is meant by "two shoots"..?