TripleTab

This mess of development priorities has gone on long enough. Reto made decisions over the years and followed them up with their action to just let the customer base suffer with their half-baked RTS/War/Campaign Map. It appears to be time to remove the lifeless "GENERALS" portion of the game and clear up the confusion. Building an Army and fighting with friends to conquer Europe just is not a priority. Ask Reto! They clearly do not care about the long-term patrons of their product.

Interesting material discussed by Reto. Contained in the "Bonus" material. .

1) MULTI-ECHELON COMMAND TEAMS 2) INFORMATION TRANSFORMATION 3) RETAINING & BRINGING BACK GREAT CUSTOMERS 4) SHARING THE BILL - ASSAULT TEAM OWNER & ACTION BATTLE PLAYER 5) NEW CHARACTER PURCHASES 6) RTS/CAMPAIGN MAP/STRATEGIC WAR IMPROVEMENTS 7) PROGRESSION APPROACH TO ATTAIN VOIP COMMUNICATIONS 8 ) HQ CROWD CONTROL, TF WAR FIGHTING, AND AUX MENTORSHIP Bonus: CAMPAIGN MAP (RTS & WAR) TOPICS - H&G DEVELOPERS Reto must invest in the RTS/War/Campaign Map to attract and retain gamers who are interested in building an Army and deploying it into an ongoing struggle for control of Europe. .

DECREASE THE WARMAP IN SIZE GAME NAME CHANGE? ABANDON RTS? .

1. a. The scarcity the author is referring to is the number of each type of troops amassed in a campaign map node. If there is more than enough of every type of Assault Team (AT), then there really is not scarcity. There should be advantages and disadvantages to moving ATs into an Action Battle. There should also not be enough of every high-end AT to populate every Action Battle on the frontline. 1. b. Agreed. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME 2. Auto Resolve (AR) - Searching for a Solution 5. a. Agreed. Waging War: A Vision of Conflict 5. b. Most important Reto action is to make a better game. A lot of "BIG" valueless projects (e.g. Squad 2.0) were done over the years diverting development resources. In addition instead of improving and expanding the game, it was easier to do a "no-value-added" User Interface (U/I) changes. Reto had an enormous opportunity to take advantage of a multi-million dollar marketing campaign being paid for by multiple other video game companies. World War II (WWII) was a big fade 2017 - 2020. Little effort was made by Reto Moto. The call to action (link below) was made in MAY 2017, CoD WWII title release in NOV 2017 and the Battlefield WWII game released in OCT 2018. H&G added WWII to their official name in DEC 2018. Reto also offered up a knock-off copy of the main CoD marketing image. It takes money to make money. Very little marketing or effort was made. Most web sites still do not use the new rebranded name for the product. Carving out Market Share Honor and express gratitude toward your customers. Retaining & Bringing Back Great Customers .

I believe the RTS has been shelved permanently. Good list. Good run through. .

@starkdog .

I have been unable to play H&G for a year. .

What are your thoughts? @Rdanzer @Matt6767 @Gerrit. @geschlittert @HarmlessHarry @Kyrie626 @Flint74 @Kilowolf @WarDaemon @AxeHeadSlam @Lemarcq @meforte .

Instead of placing effort on improving the War/RTS, we get flamethrowers and shovel art. How about a User Interface (U/I) change or another "big project" that wastes valuable development resources? Reto, Work on the Campaign Map portion of the game. You know the 'Generals' side of the product name. .

.

It's mid-July. This overview of development is from May 2020. Flamethrowers !?! Really? Just shocking... The Reto development team may want to start working on the RTS/Campaign Map/War before it's too late. .

.

How about two clusters of three for the three factions? In the West... American - London Soviet - Rotterdam German - Paris In the East... American - Warsaw Soviet - Kiev German - Minsk . .

.

Scarcity is very important. Proposed H&G Resource System Suggested H&G Development Priorities Multi-Echelon Command Teams CROWD CONTROL with HQs - Opportunity for a Command Structure authored by Rdanzer And, many other ways to expand the RTS (Generals) portion of the game. Ability to undeploy without penalty if over 3 action battle nodes away from the frontline @Gerrit. & @Melvinivs .

A Reason to Participate in the War Retaining & Bringing Back Great Customers Have the Campaign Map change for different War iterations. Here are some other ideas: Token Plus - Seasons, Illumination, Weather, Terrain, Uniforms Prisoners of War (POWs) Spy AT Scout Asset View Distance & Special Abilities Partisan, Pathfinder, & Mech Recon Specialized Function- Assault Teams Hook'em !! -> Combined Arms Exercise HQ Crowd Control, TF War Fighting, and AUX Mentorship Innovate! Bots do the Dirty Work!! .

Auto Resolve (AR) - Searching for a Solution Campaign Map Variations - A New Challenge Reto abandoning the very important RTS portion of Heroes .... & ... GENERALs free to play game is the CORE issue. .

1) What happened to Reto.Stenum and his involvement with the Campaign Map? 2) Why was the Tech Upgrade placed "On Hold" in the official Development Overview? Campaign Map Variations - A New Challenge - Dated NOV 2017 How to Reduce Assault Teams (ATs) on the Frontline - Dated NOV 2017 Waging War: A Vision of Conflict - Dated May 2018 Let me know when you are ready to get to work on these improvements. @Reto.RedBjarne @Reto.Stenum @Reto.Isanohr @Reto.JM .

When did generating WFs for infantry ATs change? I thought that infantry was one of the few ATs that made WFs? .

Your account starts with a Infantry soldier and most folks likely purchase an infantry AT as their first Assault Team. Infantry ATs can generate War Funds (WFs) where other ATs deplete WFs.

So if you improve the User Interface of AA Guns, but can't shoot down an aircraft is that still an improvement? "more intuitive, less intrusive " - Do they function according to their intended purpose? Damn, that looks good... and it's broke? .

1) Did this just get fixed? When was an AA-truck able to shoot down an aircraft that was not Recon aircraft or transport plane? 2) A single German AA-truck versus a single American P38 aircraft. a. The old chances of a single German AA-truck versus a single American P38 aircraft. Who would win the encounter was 0% AA to 100% P38. b. What is the percentage chance for each now? .